Architectural plans and laptop on a messy desk with a model sailboat.

© Adobe Stock / herjunart

Review Panel

The Review Panel German Research Vessels (GPF) currently comprises 29 members, who are assigned to one or both of the panel’s subpanels. Below you will find information on the panel’s composition and structure.

Composition of the Panel

Subpanel „Oceans and Marginal Seas“
Katarina AbrahamssonU Gothenburg, Marine Chemistry
Udo BarckhausenBGR Hannover, Geodynamics / Geophysics
Barbara BayerU Vienna, Microbial Ecology
Peter BrandtGEOMAR Kiel, Physical Oceanography
Sebastian KrastelU Kiel, Marine Geophysics / Hydroacoustics
Mirjam PernerGEOMAR Kiel, Geomicrobiology
Nadezhda Rismkaya-KorsakovaU Jena, Invertebrate Zoology
Miriam RömerMARUM, U Bremen, Marine Geology
Florian ScholzU Hamburg, Biogeochemistry / Paleoceanography
Katrin SchröderISMAR Venice, Physical Oceanography
Subpanel “Polar Regions”
Stefan BünzArctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Marine Geophysics
Sebastian GerlandNPI Tromsø, Sea Ice Physics
Martin KönnekeUniversity of Oldenburg, Benthic Microbiology
Björn LundU Miami, Physical Oceanography / Sea Ice
Torben RiehlSenckenberg Frankfurt, Marine Zoology
Ralph SchneiderU Kiel, Marine Geology / Paleoclimatology
Florence SchubotzMARUM, U Bremen, Organic Geochemistry
in beiden Panels vertreten
Agnieszka Beszczynska-MöllerIOPAN Sopot, Physical Oceanography
Michael BöttcherIOW Rostock, Biogeochemistry / Geochemistry
Susanne CrewellU Cologne, Meteorology / Atmospheric Physics
Thorsten DittmarU Oldenburg, Marine Chemistry
Marc-André GutscherIUEM Plouzané, Geodynamics / Seismics
Karsten HaaseU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Geochemistry / Petrology
Sebastian LindhorstU Hamburg, Marine Geology / Sedimentology
Katrin LinseBritish Antarctic Survey, Benthic Biology
Bettina MeyerAWI / U Oldenburg, Pelagic Ecophysiology
Bernhard SteinbergerGFZ Potsdam, Geodynamics / Geophysics
Inna SokolovaU Rostock, Marine Biology
Scarlett TrimbornAWI, Ecological Chemistry
Subpanel „Oceans and Marginal Seas“
Johanna BaehrUniversity of Hamburg, Climate Modelling
Udo BarckhausenBGR, Hannover, Geodynamics / Geophysics
Christian BerndtGEOMAR Kiel, Marine Geophysics / Seismics
Sabine GollnerNIOZ Texel, Benthic Ecology
Tilmann HarderUniversity of Bremen / AWI, Marine Chemistry
Jochen KniesNGU Trondheim, Marine Geology
Heiko PälikeMarum, University of Bremen, Paleoceanography
Jillian PetersenUniversity of Vienna, Microbial Ecology
Ralf SchiebelMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Micropaleontology
Karina von SchuckmannMercator Ocean, Ramonville Saint-Agne, Climate Dynamics and Oceanography
Subpanel “Polar Regions”
Sebastian GerlandNorwegian Polar Institute, Sea Ice Physics
Ronnie GludUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Microbiology and Biogeochemistry
Martin KönnekeUniversity of Oldenburg, Benthic Microbiology
Robert LarterBritish Antarctic Survey, Glaciology and Geophysics
Katrin LinseBritish Antarctic Survey, Benthic Biology
Hanne SagenNERSC Bergen, Physical Oceanography / Acoustics
Ralph SchneiderUniversity of Kiel, Paleoceanography
in beiden Panels vertreten
Katarina AbrahamssonUniversity of Gothenburg, Marine Chemistry
Helge Arz (Co-Chair)Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), Marine Geology
Agnieszka Beszczynska-MöllerIOPAN Sopot, Physical Oceanography
Michael BöttcherLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), Biogeochemistry and Geochemistry
Marleen De TrochGhent University, Marine Biodiversity and Zoology
Rolf GradingerUniversity of Tromsø, Arctic and Marine Biology
Christian Hübscher (Co-Chair)University of Hamburg, Geologically Applied Geophysics
Bettina MeyerUniversity of Oldenburg / AWI, Pelagic Ecophysiology
Thorsten NagelTechnical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Petrology and Geodynamics
Markus RexAlfred Wegener Institute, Potsdam, Atmospheric Physics
Karin SiglochUniversité Côte d’Azur, Seismology and Geodynamics

 

Subpanel „Oceans and Marginal Seas“
Johanna BaehrUniversity of Hamburg, Climate Modelling
Jan Behrmann (Co-Chair) GEOMAR Kiel, Marine Geodynamics
Kai Horst GeorgeSenckenberg am Meer, Wilhemshaven, Marine Biodiversity and Zoology
Michele GianiNational Institute of Oceanography and Experimental Geophysics, Sgonico, 
Marine Biogeochemistry
Tilmann HarderUniversity of Bremen / AWI, Marine Chemistry
Hans van HarenRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, Physical Oceanography
Jürgen KoepkeUniversity of Hannover, Petrology and Geochemistry
Jillian PetersenUniversity of Vienna, Microbial Ecology
Ralf SchiebelMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Micropaleontology
Karin SiglochUniversity of Oxford, Seismology and Geodynamics
Rüdiger SteinAlfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Paleoceanography and Sedimentology
Oliver ZielinskiUniversity of Oldenburg, Marine Sensor Systems
Subpanel “Polar Regions”
Xavier CrostaUniversity of Bordeaux, Paleoceanography
Marleen De TrochGhent University, Marine Biodiversity and Zoology
Anja EngelGEOMAR Kiel, Biological Oceanography
Ilker FerUniversity of Bergen, Physical Oceanography
Hauke FloresAlfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Microbiology and Ecology
Christian Hübscher (Co-Chair)University of Hamburg, Geologically Applied Geophysics
Robert LarterBritish Antarctic Survey, Glaciology and Geophysics
Martin MellesUniversity of Cologne, Quaternary Geology
Thorsten NagelAarhus University, Petrology and Geodynamics
Katharina Pahnke-MayUniversity of Oldenburg, Chemical Oceanography and Paleoceanography
Markus RexAlfred Wegener Institute, Potsdam, Atmospheric Physics
Gunnar SpreenUniversity of Bremen, Sea Ice and Remote Sensing
in beiden Panels vertreten
Helge ArzLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Marine Geology 
Dieter FrankeFederal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover, Marine Geophysics
Ronnie GludUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Microbiology and Biogeochemistry
Rolf GradingerUniversity of Tromsø, Arctic and Marine Biology
Heiko PälikeMarum, University of Bremen, Paleoceanography
Dr. Karina von SchuckmannMercator Ocean, Ramonville Saint-Agne, Climate Dynamics and Oceanography

Structure of the Panel by research areas
 

Subpanel „Oceans and Marginal Seas“

Subpanel “Polar Regions”

Biogeochemistry

Biogeochemistry

Marine Chemistry

 

Geology (Sedimentology, Fluids)

 

Paleoceanography / Paleoclimatology

Paleoceanography / Paleoclimatology

Microbiology / Plankton

Microbiology / Plankton

Ecology / Benthos

Ecology / Benthos

Seismics / Hydroacoustics / Bathymetry

Seismics / Hydroacoustics / Bathymetry

Physical Oceanography (Dynamics)

Physical Oceanography (Polar Regions)

Physical Oceanography (Hydrography)

Glaciology / Sea Ice

Geodynamics / Petrology / Magmatic and Structural Geology

 

Biogeochemistry

Marine Chemistry

Geodynamics / Petrology / Magmatic and Structural Geology

Geology (Sedimentology, Fluids)

Microbiology / Plankton

Marine Biology / Zoology / Fisheries

Ecology / Benthos

Seismics / Hydroacoustics / Bathymetry

Marine Geophysics (Seismology, EM etc.)

Physical Oceanography

Atmospheric Physics and Chemistry / Climate Science

Geochemistry

Responsibilities of the Panel and the Co-Chairs

A panel is assembled for each meeting based on the proposals received and is made up of both standing GPF members and additional subject experts. Cruise proposals are reviewed based on uniform review criteria: these are to be found in the GPF Guidelines for Reviewing Cruise Proposals(Download). Assessments are discussed individually at meetings, with any panel members who may potentially be subject to a conflict of interest being excluded from the discussion. The panel then arrives at a joint recommendation on inclusion in the cruise scheduling process and, where applicable, on funding under SPP 2520. In the case of SPP proposals, this also includes a recommendation on the amount of funding to be awarded. For all positively reviewed proposals, the panel determines the number of working days at sea, the number of berths and the chief scientist. It may also make inclusion in the cruise scheduling process subject to certain requirements: in this case, approval is granted on a provisional basis. Subsequent assessment of whether such conditions and requirements have been met likewise falls within the panel’s remit.

The co-chairs are elected from among the standing panel members: they chair the meetings and serve as the primary contact persons for the GPF Office. They are consulted on all essential matters, concerning decisions on individual proposals and the ongoing refinement of the process. The former naturally does not apply in cases where there is the appearance of a conflict of interest.

The panel is not responsible for operational cruise scheduling; this is the task of the respective ship operators. If competing demands arise between different positively reviewed cruise proposals during the scheduling process, the panel may be consulted to advise on scientific priority.

The GPF and the co-chairs also take part in monitoring compliance with reporting requirements. Cruise reports may be reviewed by the panel on a spot-check basis. Extended abstracts submitted for the status conference are reviewed by the GPF, and GPF members participate in the status conference. If any uncertainties remain after the relevant report has been presented at the status conference, the panel may make formal completion of the project subject to certain conditions.

Members of the GPF are selected based on the following criteria:

  • The researcher must be an established and reputable figure in the relevant research area, have experience of international projects, and be able to represent the scientific discipline with authority.
  • The aim is to ensure that all major scientific disciplines relevant to marine and polar research are represented (physical, chemical and biological oceanography; geology; geophysics; geochemistry and biogeochemistry; organismic biology; meteorology; glaciology) (disciplinary balance).
  • The principal national marine institutes and research institutions should be represented on the GPF (regional balance).
  • GPF membership should be drawn in roughly equal proportions from universities and non-university research institutions (institutional balance).
  • Among GPF members there should be a sufficient number of individuals with hands-on experience of carrying out their own research cruises.
  • Female researchers should be appropriately represented in the GPF.
  • A significant proportion of members should be employed at research institutions outside Germany.

In order to ensure the participation of international reviewers, the working language of the GPF is English. 

Approximately one year before the start of a mandate period, the organisations and institutions entitled to make nominations are invited to propose potential members for the upcoming period.

The following institutions are entitled to submit nominations:

  • German Marine Research Consortium
  • German Marine Research Alliance
  • German Physical Society
  • German Meteorological Society
  • German Geophysical Society
  • German Bunsen Society for Physical Chemistry
  • German Geological Society
  • Palaeontological Society
  • German Mineralogical Society
  • German Zoological Society
  • German Society for Plant Sciences
  • Association for General and Applied Microbiology
  • German Chemical Society
  • AWI Board of Directors
  • GEOMAR Board of Directors
  • IOW Board of Governors
  • German Research Fleet Coordination Centre
  • Members of the relevant DFG review boards (2.12, 2.13, 2.21, 3.41, 3.42, 3.43, 3.44)

The DFG compiles all nominations and, in coordination with the BMFTR, arranges them in a ranking that reflects the criteria for selecting panel members. Once the members of a panel have been selected, this selection is coordinated with the relevant DFG review board (usually Review Board 3.41) and confirmed by the BMFTR. The term of office begins with the inaugural meeting of the relevant mandate period and ends with the inaugural meeting of the subsequent mandate period.

The GPF Office takes great care in planning the meetings to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest. Potential conflicts of interest must be declared at the beginning of each GPF meeting. GPF members for whom there is an apparent conflict of interest with regard to a cruise proposal must leave the meeting room while the proposal in question is being discussed. There is a potential conflict of interest if any of the following criteria apply in relation to the authors of a cruise proposal:

  • first-degree family relationship, marriage, civil partnership or cohabitation in a marriage-like relationship
  • personal financial interests, or financial interests of the persons listed under the first point
  • close scientific collaboration, whether current, planned or in the last three years
  • institutional dependence or supervisory relationship (e.g. teacher–student relationship up to and including the postdoctoral phase) up to six years after the end of that relationship
  • affiliation with, or impending move to, the same university faculty or the same non-university research institution
  • preparation of a proposal or implementation of a project in a closely related research area (competition)
  • involvement in ongoing or recently completed appointment procedures (within the last twelve months) as an applicant or as an internal member of the appointment committee

Working in the same city but at different institutions does not constitute a potential conflict of interest. 

GPF meetings are held in confidence so that members can speak openly and frankly during the discussions. Information on review outcomes and meeting procedures can only be obtained from the GPF Office.